Skip to Content

Grievance Redressal machinery - Representations from Railway servants on service matters.

Printer-friendly version
  • When Railway servant wish to seek redress of a grievance, he has to address the matter to his immediate official superior or the Head of his office or such other authority at the lowest level who is  competent to deal with the matter.
  • An appeal or representation to a higher authority must not be made unless the appropriate lower authority has already rejected the claim or refused relief or ignored or unduly delayed the disposal of the case.
  • Representations to still higher authorities must not be made unless all means of securing attention or redress from lower authorities have been exhausted.
  • Any attempt by a Government servant to seek  a decision on such issues in a Court of Law, [even in cases where such a remedy is legally admissible] without first exhausting the normal official channels of redress, can only be regarded as contrary to official propriety and subversive of good  discipline and may well justify the initiation of  disciplinary action against the Government servant.
  • .The representations from Government servants on service matters may be broadly classified as follows:

 

  1. Representations/complaints regarding non-payment of salary /allowances or other dues.
  2. Representations on other service matters.
  3. Representations against the orders of the immediate superior authority.
  4. Appeals and petitions under statutory rules and orders [eg. Classification, Control and Appeal Rules and the petition instructions].
  • In regard to representations of the type mentioned at [1] & [2] above, if the individual has not received a reply thereto within a month of its submission, he can address, or ask for an interview with the next higher officer for redress of his grievances.  Such superior officer should immediately send for the papers and take such action as may be called for, without delay.
  • Representations of the type mentioned at [3] above, would be made generally only in cases where there is no provision under the statutory rules or orders for making appeals or petitions.  Such representations also should be dealt with as expeditiously as possible.  The provisions of the preceding paragraph would apply to such representations also, but not to later representations made by the same Government servant on the same subject after his earlier representation has been disposed off appropriately.
  • In regard to the representations of the type mentioned at [4] above, although the relevant rules or orders do not prescribe a time limit for disposing of appeals and petitions by the competent authority, it should be ensured that all such appeals and petitions receive prompt attention and are disposed within a  reasonable time.  If it is anticipated that an appeal or a petition cannot be disposed of within a month of its submission, an acknowledgement or an interim reply should be sent to the individual within a month. 
  • The treatment of advance copies of representations received by still higher authorities should be governed by the following general principles:
  • [a] If the advance copy does not clearly show that all means of securing attention or redress from lower authorities have been duly tried and exhausted, the representation should be ignored or rejected summarily on that ground, the reasons being communicated briefly to the Government servant.  If the Government servant persists in thus prematurely addressing the higher authorities, suitable disciplinary action should be taken against him.
  • [b] If the advance copy shows clearly that all appropriate lower authorities have been duly addressed and exhausted, it should be examined to ascertain whether on the facts as stated some grounds for interference or for further consideration appear, prima facie, to exist.  Where no such grounds appear, the representation may be ignored or summarily rejected, the reasons being communicated briefly to the Government servant.
  • [c] Even where some grounds for interference or further consideration appear to exist, the appropriate lower authority should be asked, within a reasonable time, to forward  the original representation, with report and comments on the points urged.  There is ordinarily no justification for the passing of any orders on any representation without thus ascertaining the comments of the appropriate lower authority. 

 

Ref:

  1. Office Memorandum No.118/52-Ests. Dated 30.4.1952. of Ministry of Home Affairs
  2. railway Board’s letter No.E52RG6-2 dated 4.11.1952
  3. Railway Board letter No. E[D&A]2010 GS1-1 dated 25.5.2010   [RBE No.78/10]
  4. Office Memorandum.25/52/52-Ests dated 11.10.1952 from Jt. Secretary to Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs
  5. Board’s letter No. E[D&A]69 RG 6-3 dated 14.2.69
  6. Office Memorandum No. 11013/7/99-Estt. (A) dated 01.11.1999 of Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions [DOP&T]

Comments

Sub: Service Record. Ref:

Sub: Service Record.

Ref: Sr.DPO/HWH,s  O.O  No.- E/Elect (G)/Transferred/IRID dt. 07.10.2010

Respected Sir,

                       In response to the above subject I like to draw your kind attention that, I have been transferred from Howrah division on 7.10.2010 and joined to SDAH Division on 8.10.2010.But my service record was not sent for long time from Howrah division. Many times I appealed for proper channel and also direct to the Howrah Divisional office in last 39 to 40 months and I also given this to Sealdah Grievance Cell vide No. 20130520142035.

                     On 24/01/2014, following my appeal they handed over my SR which was deposited to Sr.DPO/E-18/SDAH but not vetted by Howrah division.I meet personally to the Sr. DPO/E-18/SDAH office 20 to 30 times in last two and half months and requested  to resend the same, but did not take any action and saying that she has not any time to see the matter because she is busy with other urgent work. Welfare officer requested her to look after the matter but no result has been made till date.       

                     Sir, it should be noted that a large time has already been spent but I have not yet got my payment for the months of OCT’2010 and NOV’2010. It has also made problem to adjust my basic as my date of appointment is 21st June 2001. 

                       Under these circumstances you are hereby requested to do needful for necessary vetting by re-sending the Service Record to Howrah division as urgent basis and oblige me.

                                                Thanking you.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       DEBASISH MONDAL

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Mob: 9088389890

मैं एक ईमानदार कर्मचारी हूँ

मैं एक ईमानदार कर्मचारी हूँ तथा J.E./Bridge UNDER " SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER / BRIDGE/NCR 
के स्थाई-पद पर तैनात था.
मेरे पास कभी भी कोई स्टोर नही रहा और न ही कोई ठेके का कार्य. अर्थात मैं कभी भी किसी सेंसटीटिव पोस्ट पर तैनात नहीं रहा
 
        1. क्या प्रशाशन मेरा स्थानांतरण उत्तर मध्य रेलवे के बाहर रेल बीद्युतीकरण में भुबनेश्वर बिना मेरी सहमति प्राप्त किए कर सकती है ?-
 
please reply.
 
 

while removing me from

while removing me from service in 1998 , compassionate allowance was not sanctioned to me , till 2011 I was unaware of the fact, When i approached in 2012 , they say my DAR files are not available , I has given copies of the DAR judgments , copy from the CRSE etc ., even then they are dodging the orders since 2012.

They are talking nicely , but are not sanctioning the things

Whom to contact

 

Appeal to DPO, then DRM.

Appeal to DPO, then DRM.

 sir, I was promoted as

 sir,

I was promoted as travelling ticket inspector in the old pay scale of 5500_ 9000 in the year july 2001and my junior who was later on promoted in the year november 2003 is drawing more basic pay than me though i am fullfiling all conditions for stepping up pay The personnel dept has forwarded my eligiblity to accounts dept the accounts dept have disallowed claim stating that i   have not opted for fixation of pay when i was promoted my earlier increment was in the month of april and i was promoted in the month of july

  The rules are clear but

  The rules are clear but only in the safer side of the administration and management. There is no  time framed commitment  for the administration to redress any issue from an employee  in service and  to an employee who retires in the process of representation .  When ever he is appealing to the next higher up it becomes mandatory to the affected employee to give the whole history and the copies,   a more or less restart of the issue from the very beginning.  In the process if the officer or the dealing assistant  gets transfered/promoted -  it is  again the head ache of the employee to restart the whole issue from the beginning to the new officer and so on. 

      The dealing officer after a reasonable delay/waiting period  as process and will forward the case to the higher up without any commitment with  a copy to the employee accordingly to further process with the higher up.  Again it becomes the responsibility of the employee to write to the next officer with all the copies.  Thus an endless process for him till his life.

This is the status and working style of the administration.  and the management.

 

mukundan

Respected Sirs, I

Respected Sirs,

I challenged the panel for wrong selection procedure i.e, in place of Merit , Pay  Grade seniority was choosen , in CAT/Kolkata in the year 2005 and Judgment passed in favor of me on 30-07-2009. At last panel was formed and published on 06-03-2010 for the posts of Intermediate Apprentice Mechanics/Mech. (JE/Mech) in LDCE pattern. After completion of the Training (18 months) Joined/ taken higher responsibility of JE/Mech on 08-11-2011. But in seniority list our names was shown from joining date (Higher Responsibility date). We the candidates were appealed to the higher authority. Till date no reply received. As per verbal order they said that from the date of higher responsibility you are shown in seniority list. We have no other way to give you from the 1st panel date. If you required from that date then proceed to Hon;ble Court. 

Sir I want to know that whether it is our fault or administrative fault. If it is administrative error in selection procedure then why we suffer. Please advice us.

Thanking you, 

S.J.S.RAO, JE/MECH, CLW/CHITTARANJAN

Contact no: 09474549065

e.mail: raojaishankar@yahoo.in

 

As the court doesnt say about

As the court doesnt say about Seniority it will be your headache to fight for that again. 

Dear Sir,                 I

Dear Sir,

                I pray to go through the following articles regarding my service and expect some reasonable actions on my grievences from the respected authority.....

1) Myself joined in Howrah Divn. in Eastern railway 08.07.1991 as Appr. PWI Gr.III and posted after training in Feb/1993. Continued service and fallen in illness from Retinal Disease which did not cured after treatment for 5 and 1/2 months.

2) In Dec./2003 Medical authority declared De-categorised and fit in C1 and below.  Sr. D.P.O./ Howrah arranged  another suitable post in Jan./2004 and ordered for a post of 'Instructor(Engg.)' by screening with the assurance that the Post will be taken sanction from the G.M./E.R./Kolkata vice a vacant post of JE(Drawing) of same pay and scale.

3) Accordingly I joined in Sig. & Telecom Training Centre / E.R./Liluah for conducting training of divisional engineering trainees of Howrah Divn. in Feb/2004. and carried out the job of faculty.

4) Against several appeals for Teaching allowance and promotion/ACP Schemes Facility from me and from my Principal/S & T Training Centre/ER/Liluah an observation was passed that "without sanction posting is irregular" by the CPO/ER/Kolkata. in July /2007. Subsequently The Sr.DPO/Howrah/ER further called for re-screening by withdrawing from faculty post. and passed an order to hold a post of JE(Workshop)/Engg. Workshop/Howrah of same pay & scale in Aug/2007.But myself was released from the training center in April/2009.Till now continuing this JE(ws) post without  receiving the due teaching allowances for that lapse period from Feb/2004 to April/2009 as well as the promotional scopes and ACP Schemes etc.

5) Appealed to the Sr.DPO/Howrah through proper channel  but no attention  has been paid or got any fruitful advices. Just a MACP has been given in 2011.

 

Query:1)May I be illegible for any promotion from the back date or ACP in lieu of that and all the arrears. If yes, what may be the reason that the competent authority does not look into the matter i.e. lack of any rulings in this regards.2)May I get the scope for group B selection post in 30% quota. 3)How the seniority will be accounted where only two JE are working in the EWS unit where SE(ws) & SSE(ws) post is lying vacant since long (from 2004). Will this be operated and how.

                    Thanking you.                                                                     Yours faithfully

   dated    29th Aug.2012                                                                  Anup Kumar Chatterjee

                     howrah                                                                         JE(Workshop)/EWS/Howrah

                                                                                                                  PF 04657688

                                                          

YEs you are right.

YEs you are right.

From K. DURGA POLEESWAR

From
K. DURGA POLEESWAR RAO,
Retired Chief Controller, H.No.26-44-23/1st floor,
Venkataramana Colony IInd Lane,
Behind Mahatma Gandhi College,
GUNTUR – 522002. Mobile: 08019443692
Mail ID: mail2kdprao@gmail.com.

To
Whom so ever it may concern,

Honorable Sir,

Sub: To pay benefits on par with Loco Running Cadre-case of Sri. K.Durga Poleeswar Rao,
Ex-Chief Controller,Guntur.
Ref: 1. DLSA/Guntur PG 589/2011 dated 24..12..2011.
2. Sr.DPO/GNT letter No.SCR/P-GNT/661/4/KDPR/63/2010 dated 12..04..2012.
3. SCR/P-GNT/661/4/KDPR/63/2010 dated 18-06-2012

With reference to the letter cited vide item No.3 Most respectfully submit the following few lines for your kind information and necessary action please. It is to submit that I have retired voluntarily on 31st October 2009 due to Heart Disease having 3 major blocks. I Have applied for the VRS in the month of June 2009 which was accepted by the Administration to retire on 31st October 2009. The processing of the settlement work is to be done immediately after the receipt of the VRS letter and complete the same by the date of VRS. It was stated in the said reference that the Pension papers were received from me in the month of November 2009. The attempt taken by the Sr.DPO/GNT for settlement process between June 2009 to November 2009 strict proof is to be produced.

As per letter No. 38/64/98-P&PW(F) dated 1st May 2012 issued Department of Pensions and Public Grievances interest to be paid for the delayed payments @12% by the Commissioner concerned on all the delayed payment

. It is submitted that the Medical Decategorization is to be done by the Medical Department but not by my self. At the cost of the folly of the Medical Department I should not be denied my privileges.

The cost of the Pensioners Card is Rs.10/- as per the statement given in reply to PLC No. 120 of 2010. It was stated that I am provided with the same in the month of February 2010 and that I am sent another card 0n 07..06..2012 duly shown my retirement basic was 27390/- as against 28810/-.

. Despite of the Legal Notice, dt.08.02.2010 , which was acknowledged on 09.02.2010 along with the Awards given by the Lok Adalat Guntur in O.S.No. 793/2009, on the file of the Prl., Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, dt.21.01.2010 and in O.S.No. 1029/2009, on the file of the 3rd Addl., Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, dt.21.01.2010 for a total amount of Rs. 1,84,942/- was withhold willfully which was released only after the intervention by the DLSA/Guntur. These amounts could have been paid along with the other amounts paid on 26.02.2010 for which interest has to be given on all delayed payments.

It is to submit that I have applied for selection to the post of Section Controller in the year 1986 (as per avenue channel of promotion) from Guards Pool and got qualified in the selection. While coming into the stationary grade I am given a pay element of 30% and fixed in the promotional grade. In the olden days the pay scales of the running staff were too meager and the mileage rates were increased from Rs.6/- to that of 150/-. Despite given the pay element as it is a huge financial loss, the Administration felt it necessary to give Allowance in Lue of Kilometrage for the running staff performing the stationary duties. Now the pay scales of the Mail Guard and the Chief Controller is Rs.9,300 – 34,800, except a slight difference in the Pay Band dt.21.01.2010 . Sri. J. K. Naik who joined into the Guards cadre in the year 1989 is drawing Rs.5,000/- over and above me in the form of Pension. The Welfare Officer Guntur should have referred this anomaly to the Anomaly Committee for redress.
As per the letter No. GNT/Optg./T305/KDP/2010 dated 23..07..2010 under the signature of DOM Co-Ord/GNT it is transparent that prior to 17-04-2005 after the formation of the Guntur Division the records were not available to give clarification of duties of my self. The LEO(central)/BZA on my representation addressed a letter to the DRM/GNT requiring to offer the comments within 10 days from 12-05-2008 pertaining to the said period till this point of time no further communication made to me in that regard. It is earnestly submitted that I am not utilized in the capacity of a supervisor.
On the slip side from the wording in letter No.SCR/P-GNT/740/3/Vol.VII/RTI Act dated 19-10-2010 reveals that the Muster particulars from the date of joining to December 2004 are not available as the same are disposed Off as old records. Under such circumstances the very basis for calculation of my retirement benefits is purely imaginative and not as per actual and factual positions from and out of the records. As such the clarification offered by the respondent before the Hon’ble Legal Services Authority not tenable and requires a re-scrutiny for the purpose of arriving at factual retirement benefits of me Further I submit that the respondent admitted at point ‘I’ in page II of their reply are implicitly admitting that all the entries regarding my service extending 33 years have not been checked while determining the retirement benefits.
Further I would like to draw the attention the Hon’ble Authority that the date when the disposal process of records started and when completed as well under whose supervision the same has been carried certifying that the said records were disposed off as per the rules and regulation procedure that contemplated and governing the department end.
The absented statement under the signature of the Sr.DPO/GNT no where reveals the source where from the same has been prepared and how the number of days arrived at as absent. Whereas for the above discussion the records of Muster are not at all available are disposed off as old records. In group of destruction of records no piece of material evidence submitted before the Hon’ble Authority until such time the presumption is always is that records are not being destructed as per procedure.
Even though it was submitted to give replies only along with the supported documents the reply given without any supported document. It was stated that the DLSA/GNT have dismissed my petition previously the dismissal order should be provided in order to proceed further.
In the light of the facts submitted it is evidently proved that my respondent is willfully delaying the case and giving false, fabricated and baseless comments. Further it is to submit that In reply to the representation made to the APHRC/Hyderabad he has submitted that a civil case pending in the under O.S.No.793/2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge Guntur is incorrect and fabricated.

Thanking you Sir,
Be Pleased to consider and do necessary judicial help in this regard

Yours faithfully,
(K. D. P. Rao)
GUNTUR,
Dated: 18th July 2012

Hope CRB reads this.

Hope CRB reads this.

From K. DURGA POLEESWAR

From
K. DURGA POLEESWAR RAO,
Retired Chief Controller, H.No.26-44-23/1st floor,
Venkataramana Colony IInd Lane,
Behind Mahatma Gandhi College,
GUNTUR – 522002. Mobile: 08019443692
Mail ID: mail2kdprao@gmail.com.

To
The Chairman,
Retired railway employees grievance redressal mechanism,
Railway Board, New Delhi.

Respected Sir,’
Sub: Grievances and haraasment
Ref: 1. DLSA/Guntur PG 589/2011 dated 24..12..2011.
2. Sr.DPO/GNT letter No.SCR/P-GNT/661/4/KDPR/63/2010 dated 12..04..2012.

Most respectfully submit that I, Kona Durga Poleeswar Rao, s/o. late Satyanarayana, belong to Turpu Kapu come under BC (D) group from Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram District of Andhra Pradesh state, presently residing in H.No.26-44-23/1st floor, Venkataramana Colony 2nd Lane, Behind Mahatma Gandhi College, Guntur respectfully submit the following few lines for your kind information and necessary action please. It is to submit that I have retired voluntarily on 31st October 2009 due to Heart Disease having 3 major blocks.
It is requested to give item wise replies along with the statements for the money paid with along with their acknowledgements and necessary statements.
It is to submit that even though my self retired in the month of October 2009; despite representations I am not provided with the Pensioner’s ID card and Medical Card till date. It is further to submit that an amount of Rs.10/- were deducted from my settlement amount. The processing of the Pension Papers is to be started from the day of the receipt of the VRS application vide extant railway establishment Rules.
It is to submit that I was under sick list from 16-02-2009 to 08-10-2009 as per SICK and FIT Certificates, dt. 16.02.2009 and dt. 08.10.2009, issued by Senior M.S., Guntur. Immediately after reporting for duty on 09.10.2009, I got the letter of commutation duly forwarded by the DOM/GNT along with the original AMC/DMC bearing No.952273. The same was regularized on 13.09.2010 only after direction of the DLSA/Guntur. I have applied for the due CLS and taken LPR without performing any duty and finally retired on 31st October 2009. Despite of the Legal Notice, dt.08.02.2010 , which was acknowledged on 09.02.2010 along with the Awards given by the Lok Adalat Guntur in O.S.No. 793/2009, on the file of the Prl., Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, dt.21.01.2010 and in O.S.No. 1029/2009, on the file of the 3rd Addl., Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, dt.21.01.2010 for a total amount of Rs. 1,84,942/- was withhold willfully which was released only after the intervention by the DLSA/Guntur in Notice No. 120/2010, dt.24.07.2010. These amounts could have been paid along with the other amounts paid on 26.02.2010 .
It is to submit that I have applied for selection to the post of Section Controller in the year 1986 (as per avenue channel of promotion) from Guards Pool and got qualified in the selection. While coming into the stationary grade I am given a pay element of 30% and fixed in the promotional grade. In the olden days the pay scales of the running staff were too meager and the mileage rates were increased from Rs.6/- to that of 150/-. Despite given the pay element as it is a huge financial loss, the Administration felt it necessary to give Allowance in Lue of Kilometrage for the running staff performing the stationary duties. Now the pay scales of the Mail Guard and the Chief Controller is Rs.9,300 – 34,800, except a slight difference in the Pay Band dt.21.01.2010 . Sri. J. K. Naik who joined into the Guards cadre in the year 1989 is drawing Rs.5,000/- over and above me in the form of Pension. The Welfare Officer Guntur should have referred this anomaly to the Anomaly Committee for redressal.
It is to submit that the Sr.DPO/GNT stated that the P.L.C.No. 120/2010 was dismissed by the Hon’ble DLSA/Guntur where as the said matter was closed for the reason of non-cooperation of the Sr.DPO/GNT which fact is apparent from the record. Sr.DPO/GNT stated that I have represented the APHRC/Hyderabad the case was posted to 11th June 2012. My wife represented the case to the APWOMEN’S Commission who has dismissed the case stating the case pending with the APHRC/Hyderabad. In all the three cases irrelevant replies are given.
1. Fixation of pay:
a. Difference in DA/Increment for January 2006 to March 2006 - not given
b. Normal increment which is to be given in July 2009 - not given
c. As per RBE257/2004 financial up gradation is to be given for an employee who completes 12 years of service in one grade and completes 24 years of regular service dt.21.01.2010 . In my case my date of appointment is 29.07.1976 and I am in Deputy Chief Controller grade in scale Rs.2000-3200 from 22.11.1988 (Sr.DPO/BZA letter No. B/P.535/VI/2 dated 22.11.1988). I have been empanelled to the post of Chief Controller in scale 6500-10500 vide Sr.DPO/BZA letter No.B/P.535/VI/2/Vol.2. dt.12.09.2001). In this case I have been in DY.Chief Controller grade for about 12 years 11 months.
d. RB letter No. FT/8(5)/97-E.III/E.IV dated 29..12..1997 one increment is to be given as per the Vth Central Pay Commission Norms in view of my normal increment fall on 01.01.1996.
e. As per RBE No. 101/2009 MACP is to be given in the intervals of 10, 20 and 30 years of continuous regular service. For this purpose only the date of entry into the railways is to be taken into consideration. Restructuring promotions and selection posts should not be taken into consideration. In my case I am due for financial up gradation in 1986, 1996 and 2006 whereas I am given MACPIII duly ignored MACP I & II.
f. As per F.No. 1/1/2008-IC dt.13.09.2008 I am to be given one increment on 01..01..2006 in the pre-revised scale and then fixation done as per VIth Central Pay Commission norms.
g. As per F.No.7(20)/2008-E.III(A) dt. 24.09.2008 the increment given towards small family norms for 9300-34800 grade employees is Rs.500/- whereas I am given only Rs.250/-. While fixing the revised pension the family planning allowance was not taken into consideration.
h. As per letter No. 38/64/98-P&PW(F) dated 1st May 2012 issued by the Department of Pensions and Public Grievances interest to be paid for the delayed payments @12% by the Commissioner concerned on all the delayed payments .
As per the Railway Board instructions the settlements should be finalized on the day of superannuation/VRS . The Indian Railways were very kind enough to arrange the Pension just like salary following the retirement month . In my case some of the benefits were released in February 2010 and Pension is drawn from May 2010. The delay resulted a case filed on me by money lender in the Guntur Court. I have taken a personal loan from the State Bank of India which was not cleared till date. The SBI authorities have given a legal notice on me for failure to pay the loan amount to which I have replied . Whereas it was stated to the Court that the delay is taken place only due to non cooperation by me needs evidential proof.
It is to submit that I am not utilized in the capacity of supervisor from the formation of the Division till the date of the VRS for the following reasons.

a. Guntur Division is formed on 01.03.2004.
b. As per the instructions of the Railway Board after completion of one year the Division has to procure their own men and material. The same is failed.
c. Not given posting orders as Supervisory in view of 5 Chief Controllers existed.
d. Duty Rosters were given to the TNCs, SCORs and Deputy. CHCs but not to the CHC.
e. I was deputed to work in Time Table duty for a period of two spells 4 months in 2004 and for one month in 2005.
f. The then DOM/Guntur with a view to accommodate my junior as the CHC in-charge at one stage ordered to work under my junior in shift duties. The instructions were revoked only after interference by the SCRES/Guntur.
g. I am given huge banging’s, memorandums shouting for not available round the clock and at no fault of mine I was awarded 36 months increment withheld which was reduced to that of CENSURED by the then ADRM/GNT after personal hearing Sri. G. Kumar senior most CHC to me was posted with a view not to utilize me in the capacity of the supervisor.
h. The clarification letter given by the DOM/Guntur vide letter No.GNT/Optg./T.305/KDP/2010 stated that I am utilized in the capacity of supervisor and in shift duties. Despite the inspection report by the RLC(Central) Vijayawada and his 2 D.O. letters the action is siphon by both the Optg./Personnel Branches The out come of their negligence caused me heart disease ultimately VRS duly foregone huge financial loss in the form of various benefits besides lost a valuable service period of about 7 years and treat the period of sickness as on duty and ex-gratia paid.
2. It was submitted that I have put in up a service period of 33 years and my settlements were finalized without observed the rules concerned as mentioned herein before. The ignorance of the rules prevailed in many ways. For example the selection for the post of AOM/ACM is processed in the month of September 2008 and is to be finalized by December. Despite the instructions to finalize the seniority lists by December every year whereas in this selection delayed till 16-02-2009 duly added the names even after.
3. As per MC16 item 1.(IV) it is clear that the compassionate appoint may be given to the wards of the employees who were crippled while in service due to Heart attack or Cancer. The Railway Board given clearance that even if the wards are highly qualified appointment will be given suitably.
4. Point No. g at page No.2 of the reply submitted by the respondent is not at all correct because my sick period is 16.02.2009 to 08.10.2009.
5. It was mentioned vide item No.(F) that my pensioner benefits were drawn on the last pay drawn Rs.27,390/- but where as my last pay drawn is 28,420
It is come to understand that the respondent willfully delaying in my settlement work. Any further delay will cause serious mishap. Further it is to submit that my case represented to the Ministry of Pensions and Public Grievances vide the registration Number DOPPW/P/2010/18721 dated 28th Oct 2010. The case was with the EDPG Railways since 27th Jan 2012.
In the light of the facts submitted it is prayed to issue instructions to conduct necessary inquiry and to finalize the benefits and entitlements at an early date.

Thanking you Sir,

Yours faithfully,

(K. D. P. Rao)
GUNTUR,
Dated: 25th May 2012

 

To protect against spam we limit the Comments only for the registerd users. Please register  or loginThank you for your understanding.

Book navigation

Custom Search